As living organisms, bacteria are encoded by DNA, and DNA occasionally mutates. Sometimes genetic mutations render a bacterium immune to an antibiotic’s chemical tactics. The few cells that might escape antibiotic pressure then have a sudden advantage: with their counterparts wiped out, resources abound, and the remaining antibiotic-resistant bacteria proliferate. It’s a problem not only for the host—you or me when we are treated with an antibiotic and develop a resistant strain—but also for anyone with whom we happen to share our resistant bacteria, say, on a door handle or keyboard. In fact, most resistant bacteria develop not in people but in livestock fed antibiotics to promote growth; these resistant bacteria infect people through contaminated animal products. This is how even antibiotic “naive” people come to be infected with resistant strains of bacteria.

I see this all the time as a family doctor. A woman has a urinary tract infection. I tell her that her bacteria are resistant to this or that antibiotic, and she says, “But I’ve never taken any of those. Welcome to the global human soup.

  • Halcyon
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Another reason to become vegetarian.

    • ElcaineVolta
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      vegetarians still support the egg and dairy industry, which use massive amounts of antibiotics. the solution is veganism.

      • Halcyon
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I know, but seeing the number of downvotes, it seems that many people still prefer to deny the problems.

    • UckyBon
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lemmy hates vegetarians. Just look at all the pro meat propaganda posted. They’re not even aware of that yet.

      • phdepressed
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Which is surprising as becoming vegetarian is one of the best things you can do, as an individual, for the climate. It also tends to be quite healthy.

      • Halcyon
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m not sure right now: Is my above comment downvoted because I wrote “vegetarian” and not “vegan”? Or are there really so many advocates of meat consumption here?

        • UckyBon
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Given that in the real world there is propaganda to eat meat on every street corner, which is echoed everywhere online, I bet it’s the latter.

      • Grass
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        What are you talking about? Beans are totally vegetarian

    • zaphodEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Another reason to regulate industry, as has already begun in the US and EU. Relying on individual behavioural changes to solve these types of systemic failures simply does not work.

      But I’m glad it gives you a reason to feel morally superior.

      • Halcyon
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        edit-2
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I see those as complementary. In a democracy, political change can only come when individuals support it. Division is what prevents progress. Try to be decent and excellent.

        • zaphodEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          They’re not.

          History has proven over and over again that systemic change doesn’t happen through voluntary individual action unless government creates incentives or nudges to drive that action.

          Admonishing people to eat less (or no) meat won’t solve the problem of antibiotic resistance any more than asking them to pollute less fixed global warming.

          If anything, asking individuals to sacrifice to solve a problem caused by industry will just harden people against action as it directs blame in exactly the wrong direction.

          • Halcyon
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            edit-2
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The dichotomy of individuals and society/government is just an illusion. The government consists of individuals too. And every systemic change that was achieved through legislation is crafted by individuals in the government, who as a group formed new principles. Every single time when a new law is created in a democratic society, there has to be a critical mass of people who bring up that topic.

            I don’t know where you live, but am not living in a kingdom or a monarchy where I look up to THE GOVERNMENT as some entity that decides over all the actions of the people, and to which I transfer full responsibility for my live and future.

            As responsible people, we should not use the excuse that the system is against us when it comes to everyday life.

            And by the way: a vegetarian or vegan or ecologically sensible lifestyle is not a “sacrifice”, but the free decision to lead a healthy and sustainable life. If someone wants that for themselves and their family, then you don’t wait for the government.

            That doesn’t mean that I am against regulation of the industry. I simply said, if someone wants to avoid taking antibiotics with food, it’s a good reason to not eat meat.

            • zaphodEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              7 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              deleted by creator

      • girlfreddyOP
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The US still allows Bayer to monopolize GMO seeds and herbicide in America, so it ain’t doing all it can do.

        And the EU recently allowed Round-Up GMO seeds and herbicide usage so not that good either.

        • ZorsithEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Monoculture farming probably isn’t helping this either, if anything it makes it worse as a blight affecting a specific plant now hits harder. The US learned absolutely nothing from the dust bowl and has entire states full of corn and cows.

    • SanndyTheManndy
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I’d rather they don’t. As long as others are dependent on meat, their total fitness shall remain lower than mine, giving me a very real competitive advantage.