• shneancyEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    it is not a matter of intelligence to want to understand an info graphic without need to put work in it

    • CryophiliaEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      If you can’t understand it at first glance, that’s a skill issue.

      • shneancyEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        it’s probably foolish to get into an argument with someone who thinks themselves better than me, but i’m bored so

        in what world, do you read the word “ratio” then see 7 and instantly go “ah yes, 7/1 can also be seen as 7:1, instead of being confused for a bit because you expected a ratio

        • CryophiliaEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Itspecifically explains the part that you were confused about. Right there, below the title.

          • shneancyEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            you literally have to additionally imagine the rest of the ratio anyway. I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

            i give up, you either think yourself better than everyone to the point of refusing to acknowledge how the info graphic presents its information in an unintuitive way, or are OPs alt dying on this hill trying to defend your info graphic

            • CryophiliaEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I know dividing 7 by 1 gives you 7, but just a 7 is not a ratio

              Does this prevent you in any way from comprehending the image? It takes more effort to parse out what you just said than it takes to understand the drawing. I still don’t understand why it’s relevant but that’s beyond the point.

              The image title could have said MALE SUICIDES VS FEMALE SUICIDES (SKABADOO BANANAS WITH PAUL LEMON) and you should still be able to immediately understand that farther right = more male suicides

              Hell you should be able to understand the gist of the image without even having any numbers on the bottom, just “less” on the left and “more” on the right.

              • shneancyEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                7 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                seriously, are you deliberately acting like this or do you really not see how the way information is presented is not clear?

                • CryophiliaEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I mean you can keep saying that but it doesn’t change the fact that you should have paid more attention in school