It will also have to limit future data collection.

Not sure which news website I should be using for the link, sorry! I’m happy to change it if anyone has a better one.

Google agreed to destroy or de-identify billions of records of web browsing data collected when users were in its private browsing “Incognito mode,” according to a proposed class action settlement filed Monday.

The proposal is valued at $5 billion, according to Monday’s court filing, calculated by determining the value of data Google has stored and would be forced to destroy and the data it would be prevented from collecting. Google would need to address data collected in private browsing mode in December 2023 and earlier. Any data that is not outright deleted must be de-identified.

  • dmtalon
    454·
    7 months ago

    why is incognito transmitting anything to anyone. Glad I switched to FF a while back.

    • person
      921·
      7 months ago7 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • billgamesh
        290·
        7 months ago

        Incognito/private are a bad name. You should pretty much use this to not save history, or to log into a site without using saves credentials and assume it’s otherwise exactly the same as a normal browser session

        • catloafEnglish
          90·
          7 months ago

          Is that not how people have been using it?

          • billgamesh
            130·
            7 months ago

            Given the context of this thread, clearly not

            • TheEntity
              60·
              7 months ago

              I’m truly confused about what people expected.

        • UnfortunateShort
          50·
          7 months ago7 months ago

          It’s not exactly the same tho. At least in Firefox there were/are still quite a few differences. Notably experimental privacy features and anti-fingerprinting measures are enabled in private windows

          • billgamesh
            10·
            7 months ago

            Fair enough, but it should not be considered “incognito”

        • someguy3English
          10·
          7 months ago

          “Cookieless”. (Is that even accurate?)

          • SoulKaribou
            10·
            7 months ago

            I like cookieless, but there’s also the history saving part. So… “Forgetful” “Goldfish” “Uprooted”

      • umbrella
        80·
        7 months ago7 months ago

        in the case of google it seems they were collecting your data too.

        firefox doesnt do this like google, even outside incognito.

        • Gabu
          80·
          7 months ago

          FireFox does collect some data, even in incorgnito, and even if you opt out of optional data collection. Last time I checked, you had to change a hidden flag (about:config) to truly stop them from collecting all data (and they could technically re-enable it in future updates).

          • umbrella
            31·
            7 months ago

            well i said they dont do it the same way. not nearly to the same extent.

            what flags do you change?

            • Gabu
              30·
              7 months ago

              There are a bunch. I’ll see if I can find the exhaustive list, but you can look for it by searching “Firefox disable telemetry flags about:config” on your search engine of choice.

            • ZeroHoraEnglish
              20·
              7 months ago

              I don’t know exactly what flag it is but I’ll give you a tip

              Look at the arkenfox hardened config or the Librewolf project, both enhanced Firefox privacy and change some flags.

      • Socsa
        10·
        7 months ago7 months ago

        Hojestly I never interpreted it as anything other than this. It doesn’t save cookies or history. Obviously it doesn’t actually do anything to hide telemetry.