• Aatube
    arrow-up
    239
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Don’t forget all of this was discovered because ssh was running 0.5 seconds slower

    • SteamymoomilkEnglish
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Its toooo much bloat. There must be malware XD linux users at there peak!

      • rho50
        arrow-up
        96
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        edit-2
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Tbf 500ms latency on - IIRC - a loopback network connection in a test environment is a lot. It’s not hugely surprising that a curious engineer dug into that.

        • ryannathans
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Especially that it only took 300ms before and 800ms after

    • Jolteon
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Half a second is a really, really long time.

      • Olgratin_MagmatoeEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If this exploit was more performant, I wonder how much longer it would have taken to get noticed.

    • imsodin
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Technically that wasn’t the initial entrypoint, paraphrasing from https://mastodon.social/@AndresFreundTec/112180406142695845 :

      It started with ssh using unreasonably much cpu which interfered with benchmarks. Then profiling showed that cpu time being spent in lzma, without being attributable to anything. And he remembered earlier valgrind issues. These valgrind issues only came up because he set some build flag he doesn’t even remember anymore why it is set. On top he ran all of this on debian unstable to catch (unrelated) issues early. Any of these factors missing, he wouldn’t have caught it. All of this is so nuts.

    • oce 🐆
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Is that from the Microsoft engineer or did he start from this observation?

      • whereisk
        arrow-up
        45
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        From what I read it was this observation that led him to investigate the cause. But this is the first time I read that he’s employed by Microsoft.