Vizio settles for $3M after saying 60 Hz TVs had 120 Hz “effective refresh rate” | Vizio claimed backlight scanning made refresh rates seem twice as high.::Vizio claimed backlight scanning made refresh rates seem twice as high.

  • GingeyBookEnglish
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Had nothing with bad “luck” with LG.

    Sony is the way

    • MetricIsRightEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Not sure where you live but around here Sony isn’t an option for TV’s not financially anyway, 30-40% more than the competition for no damned reason.

      • VqhmEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago
        edit-2
        10 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        There is a reason it’s slightly more expensive tho. They don’t even bother to force or nag you to connect to Wi-Fi / Internet so the manufacturer can start selling data on what you watch Sony charges a little more because the TV is for profit, instead of your data being the profit product.

        They aren’t all that much more expensive at Costco anyway. Also it’s not like I’m buying a TV ever few years.

        Shit my Sony Trinitron CRT still works. That really is buy it for life. Less can be said about Walmart specials.

        • FishytricksEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ve always thought they were slightly more expensive because they used LG/Samsung panels for their TV.

          I avoided Samsung and it was a no brainer for me to get LG. My LG has been treating me well and doesn’t prompt me to get on the internet. And I got them for discounted prices as well, a 65GX and 42?” C3.

        • NommerEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          10 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Sony has always been more expensive compared to the competition. Even way back before data collection was a thing. It’s why I don’t really buy their products.

    • PsythikEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      edit-2
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Aren’t Sony TVs using LG panels? At least their OLEDs are (or were). I have an LG C2 in the gaming room and a SONY A80J in the living room.

      They both have the exact same panel, but the LG has more/better features for PC gaming and the SONY is better as a smart TV cause it runs on Android. But the picture quality is identical.

    • GamocEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      10 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      We have a 60" oled LG that is absolutely the best TV I’ve ever looked at. We only have it because my uncle, the previous owner, upgraded to a 65". It also plays basically every single video file I throw at it.