• KlearEnglish
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I’ve started to think about it as the second US civil war, the first being the war of independence.

    That’s just me being a smartass though.

    • w2tpmfEnglish
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Technically true. The War of Independence WAS a civil war. It was a British civil war.

      Goes to show that the victors write the history book.

      • DragonTypeWyvernEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Both the War of Independence and Revolutionary War imply that it’s a civil war.

        • w2tpmfEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s what meant. A civil war is only called a civil war if the rebelling side loses. Otherwise it’s a revolution.

          • DragonTypeWyvernEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Eh, most governments at least have the balls to call them revolts or rebellions if they win, instead of sucking up to pure evil.

    • LetmeEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 days ago
      link
      fedilink

      It was also about slavery, because the British government was in the process of outlawing slavery at the time, and Americans still wanted their slaves