• treefrogEnglish
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    New pipe and inner tune still work fine.

      • metaStatic
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

        • m-p{3}English
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Technically NewPipe simply parses the website and is seen as a web browser from YouTube’s point of view.

          That how they bypass the API’s TOS, they don’t use it.

        • FeydEnglish
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Trivial? What information does this whitelist hold that can’t be spoofed? It’s not like apps have to tell the truth about what they are.

          • wreckedcarzzEnglish
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            People do that? Just have their code go on the internet and tell lies?! This is a Christian internet!

            (yes it’s /s)

          • passepartoutEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            This is what current implementations like Revanced do. The endgame will be fullblown DRM. Until then, it will be a cat and mouse game.

        • eluvinarEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          edit-2
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          exactly, it would be trivial to have a whitelist server side and now only ad friendly apps can access the videos. they only still work because it’s worth keeping those viewers in the system for the time being.

          It’s not trivial to make sure over the network on a device you don’t control that you’re talking with an app you think you are talking with. Just look how multiplayer games fail to combat cheaters and resort to kernel anticheats, and then still fail to assure the players are actually using the legit application. It’s actually pretty much impossible in any open ecosystem, maybe possible on something like chromecast where you get to control almost anything (as long as someone doesn’t hack it to run custom firmware, like they do with every console ever).

          Not only is this impossible, it always makes the experience for your legit users worse (but hey, if they are fine with the level of ads on yt today they probably don’t care if google were to mine bitcoins on their phones).

    • huginnEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Same with revanced right now.

      • canEnglish
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        If they ever manage to kill it I’ll simply quit YouTube and be better for it.

        • huginnEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’ll be very sad to quit it but I will too.

          I can’t live without sponsorblock

          • canEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It would pain me to scrub through a sponsor without being to submit it to the database.