TL;DR:

  • They apologized (again)

  • They will refund everyone who bought the beach DLC and make it a free addition to the game, admitting it was tasteless that they made paid DLC when the game is in a broken state

  • They will focus on base changes and better modding tools before starting to make more DLC (previously announced DLC has been delayed to 2025)

  • Console release delayed

Honestly, this is a good update. It’s everything we wanted to hear. Looking forward to buying the game when it gets fixed.

  • ampersandrewEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It’s the kind of decision you make when you run out of cash to keep funding development.

    • AshtearEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Paradox and Colossal Order have said they literally ran out of cash?

      • ampersandrewEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        No, but if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck

        Everyone ran out of cash in this industry. Investment dried up, and they knew what state their game was shipping in. That doesn’t mean you’re wrong to be upset as a consumer either.

        • AshtearEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Paradox is extremely healthy.

          If we’re both going to be speculating here, I’m going with the more likely consideration for a publisher with record performance. In early August, they saw an early access game get its full release in an unfinished state to massive acclaim and sales (along with similar, larger trends) and decided to test their market with the same.

          I don’t even have a dog in this fight; I’m not a city management sim fan. I’m just calling it like it is.

          • ampersandrewEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            And perhaps that health is because by that point they already started releasing multiple games far too early for a cash injection, one of which ended with them cutting Harebrained Schemes loose. I’m also calling it like it is. I don’t see healthy companies sacrifice their long term fan base and development throughput for short term gains. It smells a whole lot like trying to stop the bleeding. As for assigning The Chinese Room to sequel a beloved RPG, I don’t even know where to start there.

            • Cosmic ClericEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I don’t see healthy companies sacrifice their long term fan base and development throughput for short term gains.

              New to Capitalism?

                • Cosmic ClericEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  I don’t see healthy companies sacrifice their long term fan base and development throughput for short term gains.

                  New to Capitalism?

                  No, hence my conclusions.

                  You’ve never seen a corporation sacrifice its long-term health to report short-term profits, to meet an upcoming quarterly report?

                  Ever?

                  • ampersandrewEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    I’ve never seen one I would call healthy.