• gregorumEnglish
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago
    edit-2
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yeah, but this guy wasn’t “lots of other sovcits”. He was this guy who took it way too far and suffered the consequences of his batshit ideology in a very predictable way. He did not commit his actions in a vacuum— he followed a very specific script of escalation in accordance with sovereign citizen ideology, and that is what is to blame, for it’s that influence which is undoubtedly what led him to this very predictable end.

    The article (which I quoted) spells that out very clearly and unambiguously.

    • partial_accumen
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      he followed a very specific script of escalation in accordance with sovereign citizen ideology, and that is what is to blame, for it’s that influence which is undoubtedly what led him to this very predictable end.

      If your statement is true, why don’t all Sovcit idiots engage in gunfire with police, if its prescribed that way in their batshit insane ideology?

      • gregorumEnglish
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago
        edit-2
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        This isn’t a conversation about ALL sovcits, just this one and what they did. Besides, since when do adherents to any beliefs system always follow every tenet, or even universally agree on what they even are?

        lol, your arguments are fallacious and spurious

      • CrashumbcEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Their cowards? Many people talk a great game about their ideology but fail to follow through.

        Many(most?) religious texts require stoning people to death for violating certain rules. Just because most don’t, doesn’t mean it isn’t relevant if one person does because of that text