• Lath
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Bookmark and forget. Thanks

    • UnRelatedBurnerEnglish
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago
      edit-2
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      this link puts c/piracy’s megalist to shame, it’s also a shame that it’s only movies. I’m guessing from the url that it’s not tho.

      edit: oh hell yeah, there’s a homepage! How well is it moderated?

      • SebastrionEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s moderated very well, they change things every month.

    • insomniac_lemon
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It was a streaming site that pulled from a large amount of other sources automatically.

      Funnily enough it didn’t have any discovery features whatsoever (no front page, popular, latest etc), it was just a search bar that took you right into the video so you needed an idea what it is you wanted to see. And I don’t think it was nearly as popular as other sites (like you probably weren’t finding it from search results, as I don’t think it even had the info that’d be grabbed, and probably didn’t even have SEO or anything like that)

      • secret300English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s available as a docker image isn’t it? So we can just self host it

  • fluffybEnglish
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    When are people going to start hosting their own git servers ? It can’t seriously be that hard.

    • Maeve
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      When they can afford to get sued by content owners and feel like coming off with that kind of money and/or bump their heads, I would imagine. Unless it goes to dark web.

    • summerof69English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      What does it really change? If you’re in legal troubles, the same request will come from your hosting or internet service provider.

      • Night MonkeyEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        My guess is Russia and China and other countries aren’t giving a fuck about laws of the USA and the UK

      • AMDIsOurLordEnglish
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Host it in Iran or Cuba or Venezuela or something. Copyright law for western products don’t really exist in my country Iran. We have entire streaming service companies that provide you pirated content like Netflix here lmfao

        • SaltySalamander
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          “Host it in a country that your country has imposed sanctions on. What could possibly go wrong?

          • youmaynotknowEnglish
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            How so? Contrary to popular belief, that the 14-eyes countries can’t do shit about civil-level stuff on other countries. Sure, but they can push and try fear mongering, but that’s as far as they can go.

            No government is stupid enough to go to war over some DMCA bullshit.

          • ZuberiEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago
            edit-2
            3 days ago
            link
            fedilink

            deleted by creator

      • RagingToadEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You can rent a vps for 4$ / month, Forgejo for server is open source.

        • elvithEnglish
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I mean, the hosting company would be the likely target then and they’d probably lock your account and switch off the server. Depending on your nationality and that of the hoster, at least.

          • SaltySalamander
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The hosting company would refer LEO to the person renting the server. The hosting company would be a target of LEO in such a case only if they refused to cooperate.

        • voxelEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          old laptop in you closet is free forever

          • AVeryCleverNameEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            But dont a lot of ISPs assign you a dynamic IP which makes hosting something that can access the Internet, and be accessed from the Internet, difficult?

            • hjpoijnerflkjnEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              6 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              You just update DNS entry if your ip changes (automatically over api ofc)

            • voxelEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              6 months ago
              edit-2
              6 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              my isp doesn’t assign me an ipv4 and i have a dynamic ipv6 prefix, I’m hosting stuff over ipv6 just fine with dynamic prefix (i even have a ipv4 proxy set up, but it doesn’t see much use), just need to update it like every week in dns records (automatically of course)

  • LadEnglish
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Hydra effect pls

  • aldalireEnglish
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Shiiiit. I remember the site, movie-web.app, getting taken down months ago, I was meaning to self-host it. This year is a dark year for open source piracy repos.

    Also fuck github for taking down open source project they don’t like.

    • tearsintherainEnglish
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Just noting that Microsoft acquired Github back in 2018.

      • empireOfLove2English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        was just about to mention this, github literally has a vested interest in killing inconvenient open source projects whenever it sees fit

      • aldalireEnglish
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        What a thicc article but it’s probably the best critique of github in the internet

        • impure9435
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          It’s from Software Freedom conservancy, they regularly publish such great articles. These guys do a whole bunch of great work in general, I highly recommend checking their other articles, maybe follow them on Mastodon (@conservancy@social.sfconservancy.org) or donate a few bucks to support them.

  • randomasideEnglish
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Is there an alternative way to register a domain that cannot be seized? It seems like domain seizure is the one thing that enables internet censorship. Is there some sort of block chain base registrars out there? I’m genuinely curious.

    • PirateJesusEnglish
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      i2p or tor addresses. Which aren’t popular because it’s hard for both admin & user.

    • hedgehogEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Is there some sort of block chain base registrars out there?

      There are handshake domains, which are distributed on a blockchain, but sites that use them won’t resolve in browsers by default

    • reddithalationEnglish
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think one way is to use a domain host that is located in some country that doesn’t care at all.

    • voxelEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      just don’t use one?
      host shit on bare ips

      • mateyEnglish
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        6 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You can’t have valid HTTPS on bare IPs.

        • voxelEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          edit-2
          6 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          yah i forgor about that
          but technically you can, but with a self signed certificate only (ehich are less secure; or by asking people to set up the dns manually)
          with self signed certs you don’t lose encryption, but the client won’t be able to make sure that it’s connecting to your server specifically

          • bitfuckerEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            6 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Technically they could by manually verifying the cert from somewhere offline.

    • hacktheeggEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      From what I know, the for network fits this

      1. They need to have access to the private key to seize (and even then, the site can be taken back to warn others)
      2. Lack of centralised link buying service

      (My knowledge comes from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ua8HrgZsAg)

  • ZuberiEnglish
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago
    edit-2
    3 days ago
    link
    fedilink

    deleted by creator

  • ZedstrianEnglish
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    As long as someone backed up the repository, it can still be forked, right?

  • /home/pineappleloverEnglish
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    There are so many forks though right? Hopefully they all keep going. I only found out about movie-web a couple months ago and it’s pretty cool.

    • yuriEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      6 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      ayyyy that’s been my go to! sometimes when the normal hosts don’t resolve it’ll start auto-playing russian dubs, it’s so silly.

      Fucken William H. Macy is all like “вот что ты пропустил на прошлой неделе в сериале Shameless” and I just lose it.

  • smileyheadEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    6 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    We need to get more stuff into darknet.

  • spiritedpauseEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    movie-web always seemed like such a sitting duck for takedowns like this. Any form of piracy that’s grabbing from a few centralized streaming servers is bound to be shut down.

    P2P torrents over a VPN is the most resilient way to do piracy.