fne8w2ahtoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·10 months agocross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardian(www.theguardian.com)external-linkarrow-up1515arrow-down112message-square137fedilink
arrow-up1503arrow-down1external-linkNYPD faces backlash as it prepares to encrypt radio communications | New York | The Guardian(www.theguardian.com)fne8w2ahtoTechnology@lemmy.worldEnglish·10 months agocross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldmessage-square137fedilink
minus-squareJaymesRSEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down0·10 months agolinkfedilinkNope, even never had any sort of analogous situation where armed civilians show up to insert themselves and potentially complicate matters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/07/13/feature/in-all-reality-there-were-three-shooters-oklahomans-kill-an-active-shooter-and-its-not-as-simple-as-it-sounds/ do we need to encrypt ALL chatter… I never suggested we did. The original poster referenced a specific context of a “sensitive situation” and you asked for an example, so I provided one that could qualify.
Nope, even never had any sort of analogous situation where armed civilians show up to insert themselves and potentially complicate matters: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/national/wp/2018/07/13/feature/in-all-reality-there-were-three-shooters-oklahomans-kill-an-active-shooter-and-its-not-as-simple-as-it-sounds/
I never suggested we did. The original poster referenced a specific context of a “sensitive situation” and you asked for an example, so I provided one that could qualify.