• ugjkaEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    One more reason to stick with Firefox

    • KingEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Other browsers already do, firefox users just cant stop licking mozillas balls

        • KingEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          The point is they already do unlike what the article claims

          • qfjpEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s desktop extensions. Most mobile browsers only support a subset of all available extensions (including Firefox!). Now, Firefox will support its whole library of extensions.

            • KingEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              They only mention “open extension ecosystem” idk if that means everything and also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

              • qfjpEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                1 year ago
                edit-2
                1 year ago
                link
                fedilink

                They only mention “open extension ecosystem”

                • The title: “Prepare your Firefox desktop extension for the upcoming Android release”
                • End of the first paragraph: “Here’s everything developers need to know to get their Firefox desktop extensions ready for Android usage and discoverability on AMO
                • End of the second paragraph: “so why not start optimizing your desktop extension for mobile-use right away?

                also I haven’t found an extension not working on mine yet I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games on my browser so no opinion on those statements

                And those were installed from the mozilla addon library? With full support for a mobile interface? And you tried every extension available?

                I have even installed a flash player extension for flash games

                Flash used to be a mobile extension

                • KingEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  What u highlight desktop for, the article is about android and the 10 extensions it has so far, your own highlight says “about upcoming android release” desktop is only mentioned for devs to optimize their shit for mobile use.

                  And no my extensions were not from mozilla thats my whole point I can get extensions elsewhere this whole time, which is why I mock mobile mozilla users in the comments thinking mozilla did something revolutionary.

          • BeaupediaEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            I think you’re a little confused about what’s being said here.

            • KingEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              I think youre the one confused other mobile browsers already support extensions, too bad 100 people downvoting lack the skill to google

      • randintEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Firefox has always had been the most attractive to many people.

  • mrvictory1English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Mobile FF is already awesome with UBlock Origin and YT background playback extensions. I wish to install an auto redirect extension. (Twitter to Nitter) I know it is doable on beta w/ extensions etc. but I want to see them on normal Firefox.

    • Lord_BoffumEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Have a look at YouTube ReVanced if you want a much better YouTube experience on Android. :)

      • sir_reginaldEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        use Newpipe, it’s free software, unlike revanced.

  • Rob T FireflyEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    That’s nice, maybe they can finally re-enable about:config in the damn thing too. They removed it from mobile Firefox years ago and the lack of it aggravates the hell out of me.

  • BlueEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Cool! So many useful extensions that I couldn’t use on android.

  • SiliconicEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    About time. I’m tempted to switch back to Mull from Bromite, but I’m worried about the security of Firefox compared to Chromium (that’s why I switched in the first place), I’ve heard that particularly Mobile Firefox has awful sandboxing and bad security, I’m pretty sure it was the GrapheneOS team saying this? I’m no security expert though

    • randintEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yes it was the GrapheneOS team who said that. See the paragraph just above Camera. I literally just skimmed their guides and saw this yesterday while considering getting a Pixel.

      • z3rOR0neEnglish
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago
        edit-2
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I use Mull and Vanadium on Graphene OS, and the experience on Vanadium is just okay by comparison. It is true that not having extensions does decrease the attack surface, and Vanadium does have a built in ad blocker, but it simply isn’t as all encompassing as ublock’s list.

        I use Mull mainly but don’t log into anything with it, and have noscript extension on by default.

        I also turn off JS by default in Vanadium. Both browsers have ways of making exceptions for certain sites in this case, but NoScript has more granular control.

        I remember reading on reddit a convo that basically the GrapheneOS team was much more concerned with security than privacy. This isn’t to say they don’t care about privacy at all, just that they will always prioritize security first.

        This makes sense considering their decision to only officially support the Pixel line of devices. You still are supporting Google by giving them your money (and a bit of your data in the process of purchase). Additionally, the decision to default to using the Google Play Store and sandbox the apps, rather than use the Aurora Store, also points to these underlying values.

        • JuvenoiaAgentEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          edit-2
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Posted this above, but it might interest you as an alternative to Vanadium:

          Bromite hasn’t been updated in a while, so you should at least switch to Cromite if you’re not switching to Mull. It’s a fork by a previous Bromite contributor and includes some improvements, like a bottom toolbar and adblock plus (so normal block lists, not Bromite’s less customizable ad blocker.

          • z3rOR0neEnglish
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago
            link
            fedilink

            Is Vanadium just Bromite under the hood? I thought they were separate projects

            • JuvenoiaAgentEnglish
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              link
              fedilink

              They’re different, but according to its readme, Cromite includes “security enhancement patches from GrapheneOS project”, so I assume it contains Vanadium’s changes as well as other improvements.

              • z3rOR0neEnglish
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago
                link
                fedilink

                Thanks for the clarification! I’ll investigate.

  • xantivEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Any reason to switch from Fennec?

    • CamEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Wont Feddec support mobile extensions in the future?

  • CamEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Now Brave needs to do the same and also create its own extension store