• IHawkMike
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    And similarly, why can’t Star Trek officers just set it to wide beam and/or just hold down the button while they paint the room?

    • ExcrubulentEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think the simple answer to both of these questions could be “power limitations”.

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That’s what the big rifle ones are for.

        And with the lightsaber, they have double sided ones. Why not focus the twin beams into 1 extra long one?

        • ExcrubulentEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Maybe the length of the saber doesn’t scale linearly. Maybe there’s some extremely fast dropoff in effectiveness after a couple of feet.

          And the power limitations of the phasers seem to me like they require some kind of capacitor to charge up and release in a burst. Plus maybe the tip of the phaser would overheat under sustained fire.

          And sure, you could say “add more tips”, but we’ve tried that with gun barrels IRL for the same reason. They’re heavy & unwieldy so they only get used for mounted guns, like with the minigun.

          • Tiefling IRL
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            And star wars has miniguns as well to solve that problem, usually carried by a single heavy gunner

            RIP Hevy