• AmoxtliEnglish
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    5 months ago
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Russians didn’t cut off natural gas supplies, or refused to pay for the commodity. The EU sanctioned themselves. What’s next? Blame the bombing of NORD-stream pipeline 2 on the Russian invasion? Don’t even discuss legality. Ukraine was legally bound to neutrality by the treaty for their independence. Western news media won’t tell you that. Towing the line of “feel-good” propaganda are we? Take responsibility for once.

    • MaggotyEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Nobody is bound to remain neutral in the face of enemy action.

      • AmoxtliEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        You are ignoring causation. The explanation by the West for Putin’s invasion is he decided in 2022 he decided to begin the campaign to conquer all of Europe and the explanation for the timing is that Donald Trump weakened NATO, but at the same time NATO unity is stronger than ever. These explanations are not convincing. Then we are expected to believe that the US never thumbs it nose in other countries’ business. The United States of America is the great destabilizer of the world; it is not China, or even Russia.

        What is logical is that Putin is reacting to an EU and NATO threat to a historically and culturally intertwined region with Russia. What does the US want in Ukraine? You tell us.

        • MaggotyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Lmao. No. That’s a nice straw-man though.