• Greyghoster
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    36,000 tons a year and how energy is needed to sequester this piddling mount of CO2? Leaving the pre-sequestered stuff on n the ground is definitely cheaper. Bring on the carbon tax.

    • jeffwOP
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I shared the article because it is relevant to this community but I personally do not like carbon capture. You don’t need to capture what you don’t create

      • Greyghoster
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Thanks for the article. Your thoughts are probably similar to mine in that carbon capture probably is part of the solution but it’s hard to see how the volume of CO2 captured can be ramped up enough to be meaningful. It is certainly meaningless if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels.