• Hackworth
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They’re both A.I. Yes, they work very differently, but the goal is the same - simulate intelligence.

    • Dreyns
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      No. Just. No. One is just a complex logic gate with a bunch of if, the other is a generative ia. Those are two VERY different things. It’s like comparing a rc car with a cargo baot, they are simply nothing alike.

    • Duamerthrax
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Does a pocket calculator count as simulating intelligence? You should work on simulating intelligence.

      • HackworthEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Is Doom running on the calculator?

        • Duamerthrax
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          yes

          But you don’t seem to understand the difference between a simple Turing Machine and a Machine Learning models.

          • HackworthEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I understand them both well enough to implement them in my projects. I don’t see why people are anything other than excited about the implementation of more capable AI in games. Are these initial implementations garbage? Probably, but that’s just growing pains, So what is it about gen AI that actually bothers people?

            • Duamerthrax
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              So what is it about gen AI that actually bothers people?

              It’s being used corporate suits to replace talented artists, writers, programmers, and voice actors and make their shareholders happy. Although this is Ubisoft, so they already making substandard products anyway. I mean, how do you fuck up the login system for your online table top games as much as they did?

              • HackworthEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                So I work in a creative industry (video production), and have for like three decades. If A.I. can do a lot of the work I do just as well, no part of me wants to continue to do that work. Most of what I get paid for is not “art” in the sense that it expresses some fundamental drive in me. But I do love collaborating with A.I.s to create things that I would’ve never been able to do on my own (and that A.I. would have never been able to do without me). This is where things are going, and I totally grant that greedy corpos doing greedy corpo shit is not to be lauded. But that’s an Ubisoft problem, not a gen AI problem. People are the issue with A.I.

        • Dreyns
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Ah yes now that you made a fool of yourself you start acting like one to play it cool. You really out did yourself on the personal development today didn’t you ? :)

          • HackworthEnglish
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The salt runs deeper than I expected.