• GiooschiEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    They used to, but they weren’t very good.

    • sfantuEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Lol If they don’t manage to make a decent one they’re done.

      That being said I would love an "not so good " x86 smartphone with usb video out and desktop mode.

      But clearly that ain’t going to happen all the ARM shit must be sold .

      • borariEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The reason for a lack of “not so good” x86 smartphone chips isn’t some desire to sell “all the ARM shit”. Device manufacturers have to pay to license the ARM instruction set, if there was a viable alternative they would be using it.

        The issue is power consumption. Look at the battery life difference between the Intel and Apple Silicon ARM MacBooks. Look at the battery life difference between an x86 and ARM Windows laptop. x86 chips run too hot and need too much power to be viable in a smartphone.

        What purpose would an x86 smartphone serve anyway? Also bro you gotta chill on the ellipses.

        • sfantuEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Removed by mod

          • borariEnglish
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago
            edit-2
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Jesus christ bro you need to fucking relax before your heart pops. If you care about openness then call for phone/tablet/laptop manufacturers to shift to RISC-V.

            Nothing lasts forever, and x86 and x86_64 have lasted for eons. We will move away from x86, probably in your lifetime (unless you give yourself a coronary event which is honestly pretty likely all things considered), so you should probably come to terms with it.

            I honestly can’t tell if your unhinged response is a joke or legit. If you had just tossed in ellipses liberally, in place of every single other punctuation, I would have known you were joking. With the Trumpian/boomer FB caps rant, I’m thinking maybe you’re actually serious?

            Edit - You edited your comment to add more information, which is kind of a dick move. “Intel Atom” is a line of processors, not a specific processor. In trying to find the specs for their last released Mobile SoC processor, the Atom x3-C3295RK I think, Intels spec sheet doesn’t even give a TDP, they instead list a SDP, or “Scenario Design Power”. They didn’t publish the actual TDP of the chip that I can find, which is pretty telling. Also clocked at 1.1Ghz. The contemporary Snapdragon 835 beat that Atom chip in to the dirt.

            • sfantuEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago
              edit-2
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Removed by mod

              • borariEnglish
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Wow you’re really doubling down on the ranting and raving huh?