Hopefully a blow to planned obsolescence

  • Bookmeat
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Commitment against planned obsolescence would be 20 years minimum.

    • hemkoEnglish
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Nah that doesn’t make sense, but 7 years and open-sourcing drivers would cut it

    • KISSmyOSFeddit
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      20 years ago, no one owned a smart phone. And most people still didn’t have cell phones or a laptop.

      • RobotToaster
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        20 years ago, no one owned a smart phone.

        The handspring visor, one of the first smartphones, was released in 2000. I owned one, although a few years later and second hand.

        It still works too, except the phone part is 1g only, so there’s no network for it any more.

    • kassuro
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well, long before that the device would stop working. More important would be improved repairability. My current phone is in year 4 and the hardware is starting to die. But I can’t replace the battery or other parts that start breaking. 20 year software support means nothing without that hardware lasting that long.

      In that regard I think 7 years is already plenty. If they pair that with easy to replace batteries and screens that would go a long way.