• MaggotyEnglish
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

    • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

      Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

      I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence

      • MaggotyEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

        • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

          I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

          • MaggotyEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

            • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

              You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?