The research from Purdue University, first spotted by news outlet Futurism, was presented earlier this month at the Computer-Human Interaction Conference in Hawaii and looked at 517 programming questions on Stack Overflow that were then fed to ChatGPT.

“Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose, the new study explained. “Nonetheless, our user study participants still preferred ChatGPT answers 35% of the time due to their comprehensiveness and well-articulated language style.

Disturbingly, programmers in the study didn’t always catch the mistakes being produced by the AI chatbot.

“However, they also overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time, according to the study. “This implies the need to counter misinformation in ChatGPT answers to programming questions and raise awareness of the risks associated with seemingly correct answers.

  • disconnectikacioEnglish
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yes there are mistakes, but if you direct it to the right direction, it can give you correct answers

    • agelordEnglish
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      In my experience, if you have the necessary skills to point it at the right direction, you don’t need to use it at the first place

      • andallthatEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        it’s just a convenience, not a magic wand. Sure relying on AI blindly and exclusively is a horrible idea (that lots of people peddle and quite a few suckers buy), but there’s room for a supervised and careful use of AI, same as we started using google instead of manpages and (grudgingly, for the older of us) tolerated the addition of syntax highlighting and even some code completion to all but the most basic text editors.

      • Test_TicklesEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So we should all live alone in the woods in shacks we built for ourselves, wearing the pelts of random animals we caught and ate?
        Just because I have the skills to live like a savage doesn’t mean I want to. Hell, even the idea of glamping sounds awful to me.
        No thanks, I will use modern technology to ease my life just as much as I can.

        • agelordEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Bruh, where in my comment did I tell people not to use it?

          • Test_TicklesEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago
            edit-2
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            you don’t need to use it at the first place

            • agelordEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Bad reading comprehension is bad.

                • agelordEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  “you don’t need to use it”“do not use it”

        • the_crotchEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That actually sounds awesome sign me up

    • aidanEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It can, it also sometimes can’t unless you ask it “could it be x answer”