• wjrii
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    It was a legitimate protest of a stupid law that uses a legacy of inconsistent thought and limited perception to do an end run around the first amendment, but the text of the law requires a poster per building, so if they have enough in English, there would be no “need” to accept or post them. Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls, I certainly don’t see why they couldn’t use one of these or to flank the posters they do post with lots of context or more diverse ideas.

    • UnderpantsWeevilEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      Now, if a principal or administrator had some balls

      You don’t become a public school middle manager in Texas by showing balls. You’d get weeded out before you even got through the substitute program for teaching gym class.