• Vash63English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    I mean they’re a mega corp willing to lose billions upon billions to own the market. That none of their competitors are willing to bleed money like that isn’t surprising, and buying into such an obviously poisoned platform is not a good idea for the future of the industry unless you want it to be owned by Meta.

    • sitzathletEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I fully agree with you that Meta should not have the quasi monopoly that they have. But what’s the alternative?

      • Vash63English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        As an individual consumer Not much. Still wouldn’t buy their product as it’s showing support with whatever little power you have.

        In a better world there would be market regulations or something to keep a massive company from burning all their money in a market to have an unfair advantage over all others.

      • LEDZeppelinEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Alternative is not to give any money AND data to Meta

        • sitzathletEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I’m sorry, but it’s not. Same as the alternative to a meat-based diet isn’t “have you tried starving?. Only other inside-out tracking headsets are made by Apple and Pico (Bytedance). Both companies that are as bad as Meta. You can debate whether humanity needs VR/AR, but that’s a different topic. VR in it’s current state is driven by Meta.