The key problem is that copyright infringement by a private individual is regarded by the court as something so serious that it negates the right to privacy. It’s a sign of the twisted values that copyright has succeeded on imposing on many legal systems. It equates the mere copying of a digital file with serious crimes that merit a prison sentence, an evident absurdity.

This is a good example of how copyright’s continuing obsession with ownership and control of digital material is warping the entire legal system in the EU. What was supposed to be simply a fair way of rewarding creators has resulted in a monstrous system of routine government surveillance carried out on hundreds of millions of innocent people just in case they copy a digital file.

  • AdrianTheFrogEnglish
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    My ideal copyright would be 15 years or death of the creator or the end of sale/support, whichever is earlier. That would mean that Portal 2 has copyright and Portal doesn’t, which sounds about right.

      • WolfLinkEnglish
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

        No thanks.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          So Disney and Nintendo can keep doing what they are doing

          After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

          but also the same companies can steal the work of smaller artists almost immediately?

          Let’s make copyright non-transferable. For a company to retain copyright it must employ the creator.

          • SanctusEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            After 30 years not even Disney or Nintendo will pay a billion for exclusivity.

            In October 2012, Disney acquired Lucasfilm for $4.05 billion.

      • SoggyEnglish
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Nah. I’d even call 15 years too long.

        • angrystegoEnglish
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          You don’t pay a plumber every single time you use his work 15 yrs after his death.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          edit-2
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          To retain copyright:-

          $2^n for year n

          $1 for year 1

          $2 for year 2

          $4 for year 3

          $1k for year 10

          $32k for year 15

          $1m for year 20

          $1bn for year 30

          • SoggyEnglish
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Why, though? It still pointlessly favors people who already have money. Just get rid of it.

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              4 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Ok, let’s say the copyright retention fee is only paid when it’s above 1k, I.e. after 10 years.

              • SoggyEnglish
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                4 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                You are desperate to give rich fucks an avenue to maintain an advantage over everyone else.

                • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  No. I want to give small creators a tool to stop their work being stolen in the short term.

                  But I also want to force copyright monopolists to pay ever increasing tax on the property they hold that should really be in the public domain.

                  My proposal also means orphan works no longer exist.

      • laurelravenEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Like, maybe tiered to something like 5 years: pay what it costs now, 10 years: 10 times that cost, and 15 years: 100 times, with a hard cap at 15? I could get behind that.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_InEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah. Something like that. Maybe don’t even need a cap.

          If you pay $2^n each year n to retain copyright then by year 30 you are into the billions.

        • kryptoniteEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          5 years: pay what it costs now

          It doesn’t cost anything to copyright something. You just automatically own the copyright to something you create.

          (This may vary outside the US; I’m not familiar with international copyright law.)

          • laurelravenEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            I thought there was a registration fee for copyright, but I think I mixed it up with trademark