• Snot FlickermanEnglish
    arrow-up
    213
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    The company said this did not represent a reversal of its previous stance, but rather the result of reconsidering how it interprets its existing policies.

    We’re not taking back what we said about how we wouldn’t kick Nazis off the platform but we’re kicking Nazis off the platform.

    What a fucking laugh. Fuck Substack.

    • swan_prOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      55
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I agree, it’s a tiny step in the right direction, but definitely too little too late.

      • pajnEnglish
        arrow-up
        68
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It’s not though, like they say themselves it’s only a reconsideration of the existing policies which is to maximize profit, morals be dammed. First they welcomed Nazis because Nazis gave them money and now they don’t because Nazis cause other people to stop giving them money. If Nazis wasn’t bad business nothing would have changed. This whole ordeal showed what kind of people they are.

        • DragonTypeWyvernEnglish
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Plus, they can’t even admit they’re caving to public pressure. Ego-ridden Nazi sympathizers, weird how that keeps happening.

    • DigitalTraveler42English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      They’ll just do something similar to what Musk did on Shitter initially, pretend to kick them off and then quietly let them back on.

    • WrenchEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I miss interpreted the rrrrrules