aa1toPrivacy@lemmy.worldEnglish·4 months agocross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacyguides@lemmy.oneprivacy@lemmy.mlProton is transitioning towards a non-profit structure | Proton(proton.me)external-linkarrow-up1110arrow-down11message-square5fedilink
arrow-up1109arrow-down1external-linkProton is transitioning towards a non-profit structure | Proton(proton.me)aa1toPrivacy@lemmy.worldEnglish·4 months agocross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldprivacy@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldprivacyguides@lemmy.oneprivacy@lemmy.mlmessage-square5fedilink
minus-squareLWDEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down0·4 months agoedit-24 months agolinkfedilinkYou assumed and misinterpreted everything you could assume and misinterpret in order to paint standard notes in the best possible light. the old approach wasn’t very secure or scalable? No, the older approach was more scalable, and they made it more difficult to do 95-99% of the Javascript that has ever run in your browser is open source frameworks or packages No, I was not talking about frameworks. Your response was so offbase and full of assumptions that I simply edited my original post. All FOSS projects have a team of dictators… And the Standard Notes team makes a lot of bad choices that make self-hosting harder. “Just fork it and make your own” is a Hail Mary response… Because most people cannot.
You assumed and misinterpreted everything you could assume and misinterpret in order to paint standard notes in the best possible light.
No, the older approach was more scalable, and they made it more difficult to do
No, I was not talking about frameworks.
Your response was so offbase and full of assumptions that I simply edited my original post.
And the Standard Notes team makes a lot of bad choices that make self-hosting harder.
“Just fork it and make your own” is a Hail Mary response… Because most people cannot.