• Earthwormjim91
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Like I said, I’m sure that is the case. But she’s not credible given she already admitted to lying about her testimony.

    It needs to be independently corroborated.

    You can’t say “oh yeah I lied about that, but promise I’m telling the truth now”.

    • UglyheadEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      deleted by creator

      • Earthwormjim91
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I wouldn’t say every other thing ever. But it certainly brings in reasonable doubt when you’re talking about literally the same exact case.

        It’s hard to trust someone saying that there are tapes, when they already admitted to making up stories about there being tapes. It’s not like she made up a story about hearing there were tapes. She claimed she personally had the tapes.

        And again, I would be absolutely confident Epstein did have tapes. It would have been stupid of him not to. But this gals credibility about them is shot.

        • UglyheadEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          edit-2
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          deleted by creator