Hello,

I am using qbittorrent for torrenting and my ISP has refused to open up firewall because of fucking “security” reasons. however I can still seed the torrent how is that possible? I mean all the incoming connections should be blocked right? isn’t it how firewall works?

  • AreexorEnglish
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    VPN with port forwarding should work. No way your ISP can block that

  • GripplerEnglish
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Stop using your ISPs router and they’re not going to have much control over it.

    • whoareuOPEnglish
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      no they have firewall enabled on their side so even if I use my own router it won’t do much.

      • GripplerEnglish
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        That sounds weird and super invasivewhere is this?

          • GripplerEnglish
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            That’s not a firewall though, which is what OP mentions.

            • Baggins [he/him]English
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              4 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?

              • GripplerEnglish
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Maybe not, but you and I definitely dont, so let’s stick to what they’re actually saying instead of guessing.

                • Baggins [he/him]English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.

                  I think I’m good 👍

              • whoareuOPEnglish
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                4 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Yes I know what’s preventing me from opening ports. I also called my ISP they said we can’t open the firewall so the incoming connections will be blocked.

          • whoareuOPEnglish
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            It’s definitely not CGNAT. I have tested it using traceroute.

        • bierEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Ipv4 shortage lead to a lot of IPS adopting CG-NATs where they are sharing one exit IPv4 for multiple end users and that’s why opening a port on the end user side won’t do a thing as your just opening a port in the ISP Network and not to the Internet

        • lemmyinglyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Who says the ISP isn’t blocking ports via a firewall?

          I thought it was common practice for ISPs to block certain ports for residential connections?

          • cmnyboEnglish
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            4 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            They will usually block port 25 so you can’t run a mail server. It’s unusual for an ISP to block everything unless you are on CGNAT.

    • TrincapinonesEnglish
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Also in some places your ISPs can refuse to give you the PPPoE keys

  • BrickfrogEnglish
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    however I can still seed the torrent how is that possible?

    Yes you can still seed as well as download. But you are limited and can only upload and download torrent data in swarms that contain peers that are themselves fully connectable (port forwarded).

    So say you join a torrent swarm that only contains peers just like you (firewalled, no ports forwarded) then no one will transfer any torrent data with each other. Everyone is stuck waiting for a fully connectable (port forwarded) peer to join that swarm.

  • axzxc1236English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If the firewall just means no incoming connections, your computer can still reach out to the other side (if they open their port)

    • infinullEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Right, only one side of the connection needs an open port (and most clients will let that be either seed or leech side) this is why having an open port on your end is useful if you’re downloading, since you can download from seeders that don’t have an open port.

  • meseek #2982English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    edit-2
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    BT protocol works thru both parties. You have seeders and leachers (called peers). Both need to make a connection but how that connection is initiated and opened is important. If a peer initiates the connection and has their ports open, you’re good, regardless of your own setup.

    Unfortunately not every seeder does this (for various reasons). And that’s when having your ports open makes a world of difference. Because if the peer also has their ports blocked, you will never get a successful handshake between the two of you.

    On torrents that have hundreds of peers, you’re likely fine; they’ll be plenty that can initiate the transfer for you. But when you get obscure torrents with only a handful of peers, you’re likely fucked. I’m over simplifying for the sake of discussion.

  • ZeppoEnglish
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It sounds like everything is working, so whats the issue?

  • Fonzie!English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Just wondering if this is still happening over a VPN?