• ssladam
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Saw the title, figured it couldn’t be that bad. Read the article. It is that bad.

    • AA5B
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Then they at the end they give that know an extra twist by specifically mentioning two justices notorious for receiving substantial bribes rewards who didn’t feel the need to recuse themselves.

    • ChillPenguin
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      That’s exactly what I did too. I was like “they’ve gotta be exaggerating. Nope, not at all. Ffs