• ZoopZeZoop
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Yes, all genitals seem weird to show people. I don’t even show them to my parents. I tried not to take them at all, and instead tried to take a few with angles that obscured any private areas. I think my parents have seen a couple of those, but I don’t even send them.

    Perhaps the comic is from the mindset 40 years ago. I could easily see parents of that era doing this and thinking it was fine.

    • kinkles
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      edit-2
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I was wondering why you are showing your nudes to your parents and then I realized you are talking about your own kids

    • Comment105
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I think home photography was still pretty new 30-40 years ago, might be why some families were weirdly oversharing with baby photos? Idk.

      • Snowclone
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I think it’s more that adults sexualizing children wasn’t considered a frequent risk, people didn’t think anyone they knew would look at babies that way. Gen X parents really shifted a lot in terms of culture in the US, under their generation child sexual abuse cases have dropped significantly, and that’s adjusting to unreported numbers.

        • Comment105
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          under their generation child sexual abuse cases have dropped significantly

          If this is true, that’s really impressive. I’ve heard how insanely widespread all kinds of abuse used to be through history, often even openly. But if the culture shift was really as sharp as this seems to suggest, I’d be worried it could go almost just as fast back in the other direction.

      • ZoopZeZoop
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I can’t say world wide, but in the U.S., home photography was not new 30-40 years ago. I was a kid 30 year ago and I had real camera and various disposable ones over time. Maybe home videography was becoming more common 30-40 years ago, but photography had been around.

      • Zalvala
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Yeah, home photography wasn’t new in the 90s, it’d been worked on for a bit.

        • Comment105
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Would you say home photography was widespread in the 40s? 50s? 60s? 70s?

      • dutchkimble
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        4 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Also back then you didn’t have photo previews plus limited number of photos

    • TheObviousSolution
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It probably differs more across cultures. There are even cultures where public virginity tests are acceptable.

    • NaoPbEnglish
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      4 months ago
      edit-2
      4 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      At first I thought you were talking about your own genitals. It really confused me when you wrote about not taking them. Or only at angles.

      I was like, was there a choice? Could I have chosen to have no genitals? Or ones with different angles?