• givesomefucksEnglish
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    9 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    If I draw a perfect clone of Donald Duck in the privacy of my home after looking at hundreds of Donald Duck images online, there is nothing wrong with that

    In your picture example it would be an exact copy

    But even if you started a business and when people asked for a picture of Donald Duck, giving them a traced copy is still copyright infringement Hell, even your bad analogy of a person’s own drawing, still copyright infringement

    The worst thing about these chatbots is the people who think it’s amazing don’t understand what it’s doing. If you understood it, it wouldn’t be impressive.

    • GrimyEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You are missing his point. Is Disney going after the one who is selling the copy online, or are they going after Adobe?

      • givesomefucksEnglish
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago
        edit-2
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        In that analogy, openai is the one selling it, because their the ones using it to prop up their product.

        I didn’t think I needed to explicitly state that, but well, here we are.

        Have a nice life tho. I’m over accounts that stop replying to one thread of replies and then just go and reply to one of my other comments asking me to explain what I’ve already told them.

        Waaaay easier to just never see replies from that account

        • GrimyEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Some of us have to work for a living, I can’t reply to every comment the moment it comes in and it seems rude to break the chaine.

          In his analogy, openais product was the tool. You can do the same with both img gen and Photoshop, and neither of these prop up their product by implying it’s easy to copyright infringe. That’s why I said you were missing his point but you do you buddy.

          • webghost0101English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago
            edit-2
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            That guy is total loss, a tragic clown as i am not sure if i should cry or laugh about them. I am not sure what businesses they had in this argument at all except pissing off people who are better informed.

            I’ve only just saw the comment where he seemed to suggest that the final trained model contains all trained materials in full and that combined with not once but multiple times pretending they know all about llm’s that foss ai doesnt exist and we its we that all dont know how any of this tech works i seriously have to restrain myself to leave that gross misconception as it is as i don’t want them to respond. I hope the down-votes do their job.

            I am sorry to vent, kinda just had to :)