This looks amazing. Thanks. And thanks for the advice. I’ll try it sometime. With the software I have the same problems as you do. I‘d also prefer it if it would be open source. And I don‘t own it, so I couldn’t confirm or deny anything from the forum. Sorry

Thanks for the feedback. You can try it with your software. Here is the file: https://drive.proton.me/urls/M8309JQDYR#rc9F6A9RYyCk

But I read some negatives online about how it uses hubble images to calibrate images. Here is a forum post: https://forum.astronomie.de/threads/blurxterminator-nein-danke.336225/ It is in german, but I’m sure you will understand it. Let me know what you think

Edit: Since the software is probably trained on images from better telescopes/observatories it is most likely using their images to calibrate mine. I have no direct problem with that, but I wouldn’t consider this to be my own anymore. Personally I don’t like using AI to enhance or fix some of my stuff.

But I’d still like to see the results if it works.

This looks amazing! What is the Dual narrowband filter for? And why are they so expensive?

But the star trails are similar sized in the raw files. I used Siril to stack and had to set the roundness value to around 0.3 for it to register the stars. I saw a yputube fix for that. The guy also set the Relax PSF thing to true, maybe this made them not perfectly aligned?

I found the g85 used for around $320 and multiple fast lenses for around 200 each. I really didn’t find a good APS-C at that price point. I am fine with a older DLSR, but I would prefer a mirrorless. If they also work for astrophotography. I mainly see people using mirrored cameras…, is there a reason?