Fortunately such “new choices” get abandoned very quickly. Making new solution instead of improving existing ones is counterproductive. Unless there is a large legacy codebase. Smart people have invented Unix principles to avoid that.

Not really. Best Foss projects do not always thrive. Git wasn’t really better than mercurial. But it had happened to be published earlier, so it got wider adoption.

If you will create “next gen” desktop, you will just solve some problems of already existing ones and create your own. Maturity of software is far more important, than uniqueness. GNOME didn’t evolve into its current state for no reason.

Kavita, same as Komga requires too much RAM.

Komga can track ebook reading progress, by converting them to images.

It doesn’t support OPDS-PSE, which is the most common way of tracking progress.

It actually has a ui. But it looks minimal enough. I’ll try it.

Gollum. Hit integration is required if you value wiki content.

ConnectBot is fine.

Why do we invent new DEs instead of making proper settings app in already existing ones?

Wayland is like Busybox runit. Xorg is like SystemD.

Some seem to use Debian.

IMO the closest one.

Linux Libre makes Guix unusable on most hardware. It also requires much effort to configure. Learn scheme, how to use shepherD, etc.

It’s really cool, when automation tools create more problems than they actually solve.

There is really no reason to implement extensively audited runC in C, but the Dev only has the journey, no goals.

Ncmcpp, MPV with scripts

Not really. Void, alpine, gentoo are the only usable ones(besides non-systemd forks of arch and Debian). These are the only ones maintaining enough packages, providing enough documentation, not being just poorly maintained forks of X distro.

Openrc…

Misconfiguration is possible in any software. It’s not specific to sysvinit or systemd-init. Selinux was created to solve this.

I deleted it. No need for two almost identical posts to exist.