so, to quote you:
they asked for
the acceleration of the death of their people.
You’re responding to someone saying
they deserve
and defending that position.
This is a thread asking if the original responder was implying that anyone deserves genocide for any reason.
I don’t care to engage in this unproductive conversation any longer.
That’s not polite.
I didn’t twist your words.
You interjected into a conversation and I asked you to explain yourself, wherein you implied that some people deserve genocide. When I pointed this out by quoting you and the person you defended, you cursed at me twice.
While I know that responding to you is definitely a waste of time, I am just drawing a contrast for the reader between us. I did not insult you. I quoted you. I did not twist your words-- I asked you to explain yourself and you insulted me.
I’m still not sure what other interpretation I could lend to your argument as you’ve made it quite clear that party affiliation is more important to you than somebody’s status as a human being.