• cows_are_underrated
    -253 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    It depends. I think that protest goes to far, if it really damages a building. Since this didn’t its all right.

    • khaleer
      233 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Oh, poor building, poor monuments, poor rocks. If only we have any way to declare our oposition againt bilionaires literally destroying the whole ecosystems, destroying people lives and health. But for fucking sake, the poor, orange painted monument. those damn protesters crossed uncrossable line. I will not support them anymore!

    • jorp
      123 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I sure hope no buildings are damaged as society collapses from climate change strain

    • starman2112
      73 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Any protest that doesn’t physically damage buildings owned by the fossil fuel industry aren’t going far enough

      This comment is advocating for property damage

    • flying_sheep
      13 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Just Stop Oil said the paint was made of cornstarch and would dissolve in the rain.

      Merriman said experts cleaned the orange powder from the stones because they were concerned about how it might react to water.

      Might.

      So because it could in the future maybe possibly damage it in some unspecified amount, they cleaned it off to be super sure there will be no damage.

      So what fucking damage that really happened in the real world are you talking about?

      • cows_are_underrated
        13 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I never talked about damage at Stonehege. I said, that damaging buildings how’s to far. They didn’t damage Stonehenge so its fine.

        • flying_sheep
          23 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Gotcha. Given how the post we’re replying to is about Stonehenge, I guess I assumed that’s what you’re talking about