The term is quite over used in my opinion, it is very often used in hyperbole. Whether it is in terms of popularity and driving traffic to a website or a threat said to break the Internet, it doesn’t seem to live up to the meaning of the term.

  • thelardboy
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    11th September 2001 broke the internet. Every news site collapsed into text-only versions, email servers got overloaded as people tried to contact everyone they knew in NY/DC. I remember getting updates via a gossip forum that happened to have a user with a Reuters connection who copied the news as it came in. The BBC and CNN sites were completely useless.

    • Anarch157a
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      One sad irony about the meltdown caused by the 9/11 attacks. The technology that could have prevented it is called CDN (content Delivery Network), one of the pioneers of this technology being Akamai. The irony is that one of the company’s founders, Daniel M. Lewin, was a victim of the attacks, he was on AA Flight 11, the first to hit the twin towers.

    • criitz
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago
      edit-2
      9 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      I don’t believe an event like that would have that impact today, though. The internet was still young then.

      • UsernameblankfaceOP
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        9 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        So, it would take an even more world-shattering event to overwhelm the Internet to the point that normal functions have to be downgraded to basic functions as a result.

        Is it even possible to overload the Internet in that way anymore?

        • Bizarroland
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago
          edit-2
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yeah, let a nuclear bomb go off in any American city with over 50,000 residents.

          That would probably do it

          • UsernameblankfaceOP
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            At that point, the EMP would wipe out some important components of the Internet as well as overloading whatever is not directly affected.

            • shalafiEnglish
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              9 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              LOL, the internet was invented specifically to route communications around nuclear bomb blasts.

              You got me wondering though, things have changed a lot since DARPANET. Taking out Amazon US-EAST-1 would leave a massive hole in the internet.

              • JDubbleu
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                8 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                If you hit us-east-1 and us-west-2 I truly believe 95% of Western websites would not be fully functional. Most people either rely on, or rely on a service that in some way relies on those regions. Every time Lambda has gone down in IAD it takes with it many ordering applications and tons of physical badging systems around the country.

        • OldWoodFrame
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          9 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          We might be safe from that insofar as the only thing that would get the entire world’s attention that rapt is something that would also kill enough people that the servers wouldn’t get overloaded.