• Fractalfarmer English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    This is brilliant! I can’t bring myself to go back, even to visit, as I only use mobile and refuse to use that shitty app. But it’s great to hear people are fighting back.

  • OdinkirkEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Five gets you ten that Reddit will purge the moderators, get lackeys into the mod positions, do a content prune to get rid of NSFW-ish posts and comments, then try to bring it back as “business as usual”.

    Reddit has already demonstrated that they have no problem breaking their own rules.

    • frshmtEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      r/interestingasfuck is still unmoderated and it doesn’t look like that’s gonna change any time soon. I doubt they have anyone to take over that many subs

      • Fisk400English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Wait, doesn’t reddit remove subs that are considered unmoderated?

        • JackbyDevEnglish
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          1 year ago
          link
          fedilink

          Yes, but Reddit has been using the term to mean whatever they want to remove moderators from protesting subs.

  • rustyfishEnglish
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    “Now we really, really don’t want to mark r/pics as being NSFW, reads the post. “Doing so would mean that we were no longer discoverable, that we would no longer show up in Reddit’s main feeds, and that millions of people would be deprived of John Oliver’s presence on their screens. It would also have the effect of keeping Reddit from showing advertisements alongside our posts, which we feel would be unfair.

    The wording of this post is key, as Reddit has reportedly stepped in previously to remove mods for marking their communities NSFW as a form of protest. “r/pics will not be made NSFW as a form of protest, reads the post in r/pics. “Any such change will be enacted in order to comply with Reddit’s policies. If Reddit were to remove moderators from r/pics, that action would go against their own publicly affirmed guidelines.

    I have to say, this is actually hilarious. Sure, the admins will step in and switch them with someone else. But the current mods are doing this in the most hypocritically innocent way possible. Acting stupid and being a nuisance is the best way to get under someone’s skin.

    • CerberoEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      They wanted malicious compliance they got malicious compliance.

    • darkmuggletEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      The beauty of this is the pendatic fixation on the definition of profanity. Sure, no one is going to think OMG is profanity but it means the definition.