• nanoUFOOPMEnglish
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 months ago
    edit-2
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    the Suyu development team has decided to avoid “any monetization,

    Should of always been like that

    • otpEnglish
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      of

      *have

      (Or “Should’ve”)

    • ezchiliEnglish
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Either emulation is legal and you’re therefore okay with devs getting payment for tgeir labor or it’s illegal and they need to keep as low a profile as they can

      I hate people who try to be on both sides

      • 520
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        The monetisation part wasn’t what fucked them over, it was merely what made their more illicit activities worse.

        The Yuzu team were using leaks to tweak their code, namely the ToTK leak.

        • SkyNTPEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          IP law is at it’s core about monetization and developer compensation. The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

          • gaylord_fartmasterEnglish
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

            You are absolutely mistaken. See Sony’s lawsuits against Connectix and Bleem!, which were both commercial products, and Sony lost every lawsuit they filed against them.

            I don’t know where you and the other thousands of people parroting this online are getting this from, but it is not true and never has been.

          • SchadrachEnglish
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

            Sony lost all of their suits against Bleem!, sorry but it’s not illegal to monetize an emulator. The rampant piracy they were engaging in and essentially promoting is what fucked them. Including using leaks to test their emulator against and patch issues with games that hadn’t been released yet. There’s been talk that they also had a ROM stash on their discord.

          • 520
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Nope. There have been monetised emulators before that have been deemed legal (see Bleem!)

            Also if you break copyright law, the rights holder can come after you regardless if you are making money or not.

      • nanoUFOOPMEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I agree but pay walling features is just asking for trouble, I should of specified what I meant with pateron.

        • ChewyEnglish
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The features weren’t exactly paywalled, as the source code was always available. They merely provided beta builds to patreons, that were also available free of charge by someone else [1].

          ~~[1] https://github.com/pineappleEA/pineapple-src/releases~~

          Selling emulators is legal, as far as we know (been a while since the last ruling). If it’s true what others have pointed out, that yuzu devs were distributing copyrighted material in their public discord and talking open about privacy, then Nintendo has support for their argument that yuzu was intentionally designed to circumvent copy protection and purposely facilitates piracy.

          • nanoUFOOPMEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Isn’t pineapple just stealing the builds from pateron and did they release the current source code or did that get released after pateron build went public. I didn’t really keep track of it.

            • ChewyEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              7 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              You’re likely right, it seems like they made use of the code being open-source and distributed it freely after getting access through patreon. Each commit is quite big with all the source code changes of the specific early access build.

    • echo64English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Switch emulation would be 1/10th of where it is now without it.

    • FadesEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago
      edit-2
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Anyone trying to make money on a licensed IP they don’t own is in hot water.

    • mindbleachEnglish
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Disagree. People deserve compensation for labor, and the Yuzu devs did good work. It’s our laws that suck.

    • MuscarEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Congratulations, you’ve shown everyone how dumb you are.

      • nanoUFOOPMEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Sad_face.jpg I try not to be 👉👈

    • KinglinkEnglish
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Ehhh it’s ok if there’s money involved but they definitely pushed it too far. However even if there was no money involved Yuzu made actions that shut them down.

      Smart if you can self fund, but at the end of the day there’s a lot of costs that people ignore when it comes to emulation or things in the space. Working with a group called Retroachievements.org (small plug) and they accept donations for server costs but that’s it. Signed up for 1 dollar on Patreon and wanted to give them 10. They refused, which is a good sign.