• frezikEnglish
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    There’s also questions around the game industry as a whole. I think the recent layoffs at major companies aren’t just another cycle, but systemic. The market no longer bears production of giant games with crazy graphics that cost $70 and have a bunch of DLC and gambling mechanics attached.

    Games won’t go away, but they’ll play fine on something like the Steam Deck, Switch 2, or modest gaming PC. What would high end console hardware bring to the table anymore?

    • Hypx
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Graphics are no longer a major selling point in most cases. Most people would be fine with a good game that works and isn’t saddle with microtransactions, even if it means it will look somewhat worse.

      • P03 LockeEnglish
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Consoles themselves are a source of microtransactions. Just look at how much money you have to spend to have online play.

        Guess how much it costs on Steam. Come on guess!

      • ashok36English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I wouldn’t say graphics have zero bearing for sales but the scales have definitely tipped towards gameplay over the last several years. Minecraft added rtx graphics and the mass majority of people, even with rtx capable cards, just yawned.

        Digital game sales, outside of sports titles, are pushed by streaming engagement and riding coat tails of previous games. Look at the recent history and it’s pretty obvious.

    • SquizzyEnglish
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Switch 2 will be underpowered and boring.

      • frezikEnglish
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        I’m saying the Switch 2 does not need power, because nothing will be pushing graphics so hard anymore.

        • PikaEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago
          edit-2
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          the switch 2 IMO needs a power upgrade for sure, my switch 1 struggled to actually play higher ended games, and the actual graphic quality on those games wern’t bad but not the great either.

          Nintendon't Rant

          That being said, I decided recently that Nintendon’t is a company that doesn’t need my money, between the actively hostile acts to its fan generated content with the shut down of third party non-profit games, it’s prosecution of Gary Bowser(which was the extent of charging a sales associate for the entire companies fraud) and it’s downright abusive treatment of the right to repair and archival/emulation communities. They are basically the Apple of the game development world. I won’t spend money on their stuff anymore.

        • SquizzyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          7 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Current switch needs to stream current and last gen games, they will still need power.

          • frezikEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            7 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Switch 2 is likely to be around the power level of a PS4, which is good enough for this hypothetical.