• figaroEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    1 year ago
    link
    fedilink

    Deplatforming harmful ideologies is shown to create a reduction in hate speech and harm overall.

    Because of this, I am pro-defederation of hexbear. They can have a voice, sure, but it’s my choice if I want to listen

    • hackitfastEnglish
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      1 year ago
      link
      fedilink

      I believe it to a degree, but I think it’s also a problem because we can’t ever change their minds if we’re not talking with each other. If they’re stuck in a hate-filled bubble, they’re only going to enrage each other further and accept each other’s biases.

      It’s a different story if they’re attacking other people based on their own beliefs, then they should absolutely be banned from the platform. And if enough of that happens, then at that point de-federation should be the option (which I guess is probably the stage we’re at)

      • pythonoob
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        I mean good luck changing any their minds. They are heavily entrenched and quite overly aggressive.

      • Narte
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        1 year ago
        link
        fedilink

        Regarding your first point, I think there’s more harm mitigated than rehabilitation opportunity lost by quarantining and thus limiting the outreach potential of extremists. The saner, less edgy parts of the Internet are easy enough to access and these people will come across them in due course if they are in a receptive mindset. Whereas I am completely comfortable making their weird little dens of groupthink harder to stumble upon by default.