• BombOmOmEnglish
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 months ago
    edit-2
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    China is becoming an increasingly unreliable trade partner. Preventing them from completely taking over a segment is prudent.

    • potatopotatoEnglish
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Yes, but there’s already a steep tariff, it would be nice to let them light a small fire under the us automakers so they make better products for us, instead were kinda just letting them be evil and lazy.

      • BlackmistEnglish
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        But they don’t want to make better products for you. They want China to make products for you that they slap their badge on and sell you at an enormous mark-up.

    • TheReturnOfPEBEnglish
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      It is prudent for those that own the means of production.

      • BombOmOmEnglish
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago
        edit-2
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        German industry is/was in shambles as they allowed an unreliable trade partner, Russia, to completely take over a segment in the German economy (oil & gas). When that unreliable trade partner pulled the rug in 2022, suddenly Germany is paying out the ass for LNG, reducing factory output, even on-lining coal plants to keep the lights on.

        It is simply a bad idea to allow an unreliable trade partner to completely take over a segment in your economy.

        • OmniraptorEnglish
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          Germany voluntarily divested from Russian gas for political reasons. If Germany was run by more amoral “rationally greedy” business men I’m sure Russia would have happily kept selling energy to them despite the war.

          It’s probably why a certain someone sabotaged the nordstream gas pipelines, to make sure Germany’s moral compass would not falter in the future - as its economy inevitably gets worse without cheap Russian oil and gas.

          • AmoxtliEnglish
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Fossil fuels are the underpinning of industrial civilization. It was fossil fuels that made the industrial revolution possible, it wasn’t solar panels, and wind turbines, or heavy, giant batteries.

            • TheGrandNagusEnglish
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I don’t understand what your point is here? Fossil fuels were instrumental in the industrial revolution so we have to stick by them forever, planet and people’s health benefits damned?

              Nah. Use the most appropriate tech available. Which is now renewables, electric motors, etc.

            • MaggotyEnglish
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              It was water power dude. Water and Windmills started the industrial revolution. We’ve just been finding better ways to spin electric generator motors since then.

            • emergencyfoodEnglish
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              In my country, it was mostly large dams and hydroelectricity. But they have their own issues.

        • MaggotyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s apples and oranges. The German government pulled out of that sector of it’s own will. Largely because they had planned to transition to Nuclear, did not do so, and then did nothing going forward.

          Letting Chinese cars compete is not going kill the big 3 unless they’re criminally negligent at running a business.

        • TheReturnOfPEBEnglish
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          5 months ago
          edit-2
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          I doubt that UberEats drivers would be happy with that being called their economy.

          But ivory towers certainly have comfy chairs.

        • AmoxtliEnglish
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          NATO sanctioned themselves. You don’t get to blame Russia for that.

          • Alto
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago
            edit-2
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            Russia could’ve, y’know, just not done an illegal invasion of Ukraine.

            • AmoxtliEnglish
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              5 months ago
              edit-2
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Russians didn’t cut off natural gas supplies, or refused to pay for the commodity. The EU sanctioned themselves. What’s next? Blame the bombing of NORD-stream pipeline 2 on the Russian invasion? Don’t even discuss legality. Ukraine was legally bound to neutrality by the treaty for their independence. Western news media won’t tell you that. Towing the line of “feel-good” propaganda are we? Take responsibility for once.

              • MaggotyEnglish
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Nobody is bound to remain neutral in the face of enemy action.

                • AmoxtliEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  5 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  You are ignoring causation. The explanation by the West for Putin’s invasion is he decided in 2022 he decided to begin the campaign to conquer all of Europe and the explanation for the timing is that Donald Trump weakened NATO, but at the same time NATO unity is stronger than ever. These explanations are not convincing. Then we are expected to believe that the US never thumbs it nose in other countries’ business. The United States of America is the great destabilizer of the world; it is not China, or even Russia.

                  What is logical is that Putin is reacting to an EU and NATO threat to a historically and culturally intertwined region with Russia. What does the US want in Ukraine? You tell us.

                  • MaggotyEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    0
                    ·
                    5 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Lmao. No. That’s a nice straw-man though.