• TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Let’s see here, listen to my therapist who has decades of real experience or a study from over 20 years ago?

    Your therapist is still utilizing Freudian psychoanalysis?

    Well, if age is a factor in your opinion about the validity of the care you receive, I have some bad news for you

    • MaggotyEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      You’re still using 5,000 year old Armenian shoes?

      Of course not. Stop being reductive.

      • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        Lol, you were the one who first dismissed evidence because it was 20 years old

        • MaggotyEnglish
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          0
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

          • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

            Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

            I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence

            • MaggotyEnglish
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

              • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

                I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

                • MaggotyEnglish
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago
                  link
                  fedilink

                  Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

                  • TranscendentalEmpireEnglish
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago
                    link
                    fedilink

                    Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

                    You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?