Brought to you by the Department of Erasing History.

  • PheganEnglish
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    link
    fedilink

    Someone wanted to erase history.

    • NziomEnglish
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Luckily non of the data was deleted

      • girsaysdoomEnglish
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        It might be that someone wanted to change something that was on a website before the archive could get to it too.

        • KairuByteEnglish
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago
          link
          fedilink

          That’s a ridiculous amount of effort to go through to slow down a scraper for one site, especially when that site could just be turned off.

          • Saik0English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            0
            ·
            5 months ago
            link
            fedilink

            If you own the domain you can disable the crawler on it. And remove previous scrapes.

            • KairuByteEnglish
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              0
              ·
              5 months ago
              edit-2
              5 months ago
              link
              fedilink

              Then it still makes no sense, as you being unable to take down the content means you also very likely can’t edit the content. I can’t think of a situation where you:

              1. Need content to not be scraped
              2. Need time to remove/edit that content
              3. Have access to do the above
              4. Don’t have access to pull the content immediately
              5. Have control of a large enough botnet to take down Internet Archive
              6. Don’t have a big enough botnet to take down the aforementioned content
              • Saik0English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                Well that’s my point It doesn’t make sense because you can just go after the fact and make the request to take it all down.

                You have to be stupidly paranoid and obscenely stupid to believe that a DDOS is the correct answer if this is the case.

              • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                0
                ·
                5 months ago
                link
                fedilink

                On an individual level, having a massive archive of everything you’ve ever posted isn’t always a good thing, especially when mentally ill people will quote mine a single post and then try to misuse it.

    • Echo DotEnglish
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      0
      ·
      5 months ago
      edit-2
      5 months ago
      link
      fedilink

      Well they made a bad job of it because you can’t do that with a DDOS attack. Basically it’s the same as picketing the entrance to a building. All you need is a lot of people anyone can do it at any time.

      Actually entering the building and manipulating contents it holds is much more difficult, as then you actually have to engage with the building security.

      A DDOS attack can never delete data.

      • PyroNeurosisEnglish
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        0
        ·
        5 months ago
        link
        fedilink

        A DDOS alone cannot delete data, but like your picketing analogy, if you can get in first, the picketing will keep out anyone looking to stop your interference.